1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (219 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 3-Litre | Dakota |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 219 Nm | 576 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2850 mm |