1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2002 Peugeot H2O
To start off, 2002 Peugeot H2O is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Peugeot H2O weights approximately 210 kg more than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot H2O, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2002 Peugeot H2O | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | 3-Litre | H2O |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |