1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2006 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2006 Holden Captiva is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Captiva (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 2006 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Captiva (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Holden Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2006 Holden Captiva | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | 3-Litre | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1899 cc |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Torque | 219 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
