1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1968 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | 3-Litre | 207 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1358 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 219 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |