1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2007 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2007 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 3-Litre | 300 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90.9 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |