1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country weights approximately 545 kg more than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2009 Chrysler Town & Country | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 3-Litre | Town & Country |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 71 L |