1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 3-Litre | Patriot |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |