1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 265 kg more than 2011 Renault Fluence.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | 3-Litre | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2702 mm |
