1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Volt weights approximately 225 kg more than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 3-Litre | Volt |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4498 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 35 L |