1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1952 Ferrari 212
To start off, 1968 Austin A 60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 2,562 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 212 (168 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 212 should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 122 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1952 Ferrari 212 | |
Make | Austin | Ferrari |
Model | A 60 | 212 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 168 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 58.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 159 L |