1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1957 Holden FJ
To start off, 1968 Austin A 60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 122 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 1957 Holden FJ | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 60 | FJ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2150 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
