1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1968 Austin A 60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 60 | 8 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 47 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2280 mm |