1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Austin A 60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (66 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 198 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1968 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |