1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1969 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1969 Volkswagen 1600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1969 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volkswagen 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1969 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | A 60 | 1600 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 40 L |