1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1981 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1981 Austin Allegro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 272 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1981 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | A 60 | Allegro |
Year Released | 1968 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |