1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1986 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 53 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1986 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 60 | ES |
Year Released | 1968 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 104 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2470 mm |