1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (170 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 382 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 60 | XM |
Year Released | 1968 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |