1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1991 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mahindra Armada (74 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 878 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1991 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 60 | Armada |
Year Released | 1968 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4310 mm |