1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 272 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Pajero |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |