1968 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 1999 Nissan SUT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 60 | SUT |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
