1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Chrysler Java
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Java (81 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2000 Chrysler Java | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 60 | Java |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1580 mm |