1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2001 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 783 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2001 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 868 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2001 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Austin | Lotec |
Model | A 60 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 843 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |