1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon weights approximately 388 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |