1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Chrysler Airflite
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 478 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 2003 Chrysler Airflite | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 60 | Airflite |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 253 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 341 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 100 L |
