1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 594 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 74 L |