1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Noble M12
To start off, 2004 Noble M12 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Noble M12 (335 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 72 kg more than 2004 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Noble M12 (486 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2004 Noble M12 | |
Make | Austin | Noble |
Model | A 60 | M12 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 486 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |