1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2006 Nissan Altima is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Altima (175 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Altima weights approximately 408 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Altima (244 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2006 Nissan Altima | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Altima |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |