1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2008 Nissan Altima is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Altima (175 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Altima (245 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2008 Nissan Altima | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Altima |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |