1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin A 60 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2550 mm |