1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 297 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 60 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
