1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
