1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Austin A 60 (122 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1968 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin A 60 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 60 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 46 L |
