1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2012 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |