1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 487 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60.
Because 1968 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 60 | S60 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 67 L |