1968 Austin A 60 vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 413 kg more than 1968 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin A 60 | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 166 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |