1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1959 Rover P5
To start off, 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rover P5 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1959 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Rover |
| Model | Sprite | P5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1584 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 63 L |
