1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1971 Toyota 2000GT
To start off, 1971 Toyota 2000GT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Toyota 2000GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Toyota 2000GT weights approximately 446 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1971 Toyota 2000GT | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | 2000GT |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1971 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
