1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 776 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Sprite | 164 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |
