1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 121 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Sprite | 121 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1064 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |
