1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2001 Toyota Camry is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Camry weights approximately 646 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sprite | Camry |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |