1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Megane weights approximately 491 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sprite | Megane |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |