1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Sprite | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 76 L |
