1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2009 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sienna is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,454 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 638 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2009 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sprite | Sienna |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3454 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 76 L |