1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | Navara |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |