1968 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1441 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
| Model | Sprite | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |
