1968 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. (18 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 102 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. (30 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Zastava |
| Model | Bianchina | 102 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 499 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 30 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 585 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2160 mm |
