1968 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Milan weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Because 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Autobianchi Bianchina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Autobianchi Bianchina | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Autobianchi | Mercury |
Model | Bianchina | Milan |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 500 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 519 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 64 L |