1968 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (200 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1968 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 670 kg more than 1968 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Autobianchi Primula | 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Primula | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 200 HP |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |
