1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1960 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 213 kg more than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Bizzarrini A3C | 1960 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
| Model | A3C | XK |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2770 mm |
