1968 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1982 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1982 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 650 kg more than 1968 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1968 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Bizzarrini A3C | 1982 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
Model | A3C | DeVille |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3090 mm |